(post deleted by author)
2 Likes
Is a ghost town this project no development dince inception
1 Like
(post deleted by author)
2 Likes
=)) is dead bro can`t u see?
Thank you all for all feedback and enthusiasm regarding IIP-48.
We’ve been actively engaging with major centralized exchanges (CEXes) to discuss the integration of the unified IOTX token. The response has been encouraging, with many expressing support for the unification initiative. However, as of now, we do not have concrete timelines to share for when these integrations will be started/completed (that’s why this IIP is not moving forward).
In the meantime, after several rounds of internal discussions, core team + community representatives agrees that CIOTX (cross-chain IOTX)—originally issued on IoTeX L1 and pegged 1:1 to the native IOTX—can serve as a temporary “unified IOTX.” We will share further details regarding this transitional approach in the coming weeks.
1 Like
community doesn’t want that. community wants a single token, that’s all. will it be hard to solve that?
2 Likes
Such a fishy network you have with multiple tokens baffles investors.
1 Like
Boy u are speaking with walls lol. Is a 2020 issue there not new. Forget this start up and go into another project
3 Likes